<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Rice, TW</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Wheeler, AP</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Bernard, GR</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hayden, DL</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Schoenfeld, DA</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Ware, LB</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2007</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 Ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 Ratio in Patients With Acute Lung Injury or ARDS</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Chest</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>132</VOLUME>
	<NUMBER>2</NUMBER>
	<PAGES>410-417</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>acute lung injury</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>ARDS</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>definition</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Pao2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<ABSTRACT>Background: The diagnostic criteria for acute lung injury (ALI) and ARDS utilize the PaO2/
fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) [P/F] ratio measured by arterial blood gas analysis to assess the
degree of hypoxemia. We hypothesized that the pulse oximetric saturation (SpO2)/FIO2 (S/F) ratio
can be substituted for the P/F ratio in assessing the oxygenation criterion of ALI.


Methods: Corresponding measurements of SpO2 (values &lt; 97%) and PaO2 from patients enrolled
in the ARDS Network trial of a lower tidal volume ventilator strategy (n = 672) were compared
to determine the relationship between S/F and P/F. S/F threshold values correlating with P/F
ratios of 200 (ARDS) and 300 (ALI) were determined. Similar measurements from patients
enrolled in the ARDS Network trial of lower vs higher positive end-expiratory pressure (n = 402)
were utilized for validation.


Results: In the derivation data set (2,613 measurements), the relationship between S/F and P/F
was described by the following equation: S/F = 64 + 0.84 * (P/F) [p &lt; 0.0001; r = 0.89]. An S/F
ratio of 235 corresponded with a P/F ratio of 200, while an S/F ratio of 315 corresponded with a
P/F ratio of 300. The validation database (2,031 measurements) produced a similar linear
relationship. The S/F ratio threshold values of 235 and 315 resulted in 85% sensitivity with 85%
specificity and 91% sensitivity with 56% specificity, respectively, for P/F ratios of 200 and 300.
Conclusion: S/F ratios correlate with P/F ratios. S/F ratios of 235 and 315 correlate with P/F ratios
of 200 and 300, respectively, for diagnosing and following up patients with ALI and ARDS.</ABSTRACT>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>